December 9th, 2009
Incident - death
I think the dogs are on their way to becoming serial killers. Gasp!
Which Graduate shirt do you like better?
Total Voters: 29
Loading ...I think the dogs are on their way to becoming serial killers. Gasp!
December 9th, 2009 at 6:23 am
cats especially the unowned variety are a menace. If ever you experienced trying to get some much needed sleep and you can’t because of the yowling outside you’d know what i’m talking about. So no, I’m not upset that misa2 and pika2 killed the cat. Hell they should keel more!
December 9th, 2009 at 7:16 am
Like the dogs I used to have - they will kill anything that lands on our backyard - cats, rats, birds and even dried branches of a coconut tree
December 9th, 2009 at 8:18 am
A police dog just killed a 4-year old child…
Just reminded of the Maguindanao massacre…
December 9th, 2009 at 8:23 am
Wait, aren’t toy dogs supposed to be harmless to everything?
And, although I love cats, where does it say that killing cats is punishable by law?
December 9th, 2009 at 8:52 am
What Glen failed to notice is the large pile of human corpses behind the two…
Well, at least he ain’t going to be chomped-off by Chompy.
I find it amusing that the first thing Glen asked is what they killed.
December 9th, 2009 at 10:27 am
i think its just the same dead cat in the 1st panel
December 9th, 2009 at 11:18 am
“In the past, very small dogs not used for hunting were kept as symbols of affluence, as watchdogs, and for the very important health function of attracting fleas away from their owners.”
In defense of cats, Felis catus are born hunters and are marvels of Nature’s engineering.
Jopoy - I believe the Animal Welfare Act of 1998 (Republic Act No. 8485) covers cats, too.
December 9th, 2009 at 11:45 am
Lol, our dogs murder everything they can lay their grubby paws on. I feel bad for the kittehs.
December 9th, 2009 at 12:56 pm
Eize I don’t think that law covers dogs killing cats though
December 9th, 2009 at 2:09 pm
I did mean killing cats by humans. Sending out dogs to kill cats amounts to the same thing. Glen could be held responsible IF he were caught.
Of course, if Chompy finds out, he might find more mercy with the cops.
December 9th, 2009 at 2:20 pm
Cats are the devil =P
December 9th, 2009 at 4:06 pm
@R3D RJ amen to that
@Eize You’re most probably right on the part about Chompy being less merciful than the cops but considering that Glen doesn’t have willful consent over the actions of a certain bi-sexual ‘princess’ and her big brother sort of robs him of culpability right? I’m awaiting correction by the Boopie-like beerkadets (ie lawyers and lawyers to be)
December 9th, 2009 at 4:57 pm
Jiro, he opted to set them loose instead of walking them with leashes. As their owner (regardless of their personalities), Glen is responsible for them. Would you still think that he’s not at fault if the doggies got hurt instead?
December 9th, 2009 at 6:25 pm
Eize: Misa-misa’s more Chompy-like than her mom. As if someone like her can get hurt that easily.
December 9th, 2009 at 6:36 pm
Within the confines of Beerkada, I can believe that, Jopoy.
December 10th, 2009 at 1:46 am
Meh. More animals that are not cows. Pfft.
December 10th, 2009 at 12:09 pm
I agree. We should have whales, elephants and hyenas in the next storyline.
December 10th, 2009 at 7:32 pm
R3D RJ: Just curious, but why those in particular?
December 10th, 2009 at 8:54 pm
Eize: true pero if they got hurt, it’s not me who gets to decide who’s at fault it’s someone with the speed of a puma in love…
December 11th, 2009 at 10:19 am
@Jopoy: The dinosaurs and sharks were taken na hehehe…if only to please psychocow